Too Much Operational Knowledge Concentrated In ONE Person?

I saw that the situation is similar and that many companies' CFOs are basically external accountants who understand owners. The owner did not want to hire anyone other than bookkeeping, so the accountant worked. "Work" was not actually done by him directly, but was brought to his CPA company where he assigned work.

The company paid SALARY instead of a consultant to him. Over the years CPA has enabled his staff to work and repay in the company when he needs it.

The company eventually hired a chief financial officer, but the CPA still does not agree with almost everything the CFO has made to take over all its financial responsibilities!

CPA literally as it knows the owner and remains in the company until the CPA or owner dies!

Even though the owner does not have knowledge of finance / accounting, he may know how to work in the company. It is very regretful that the finance / accounting staff basically integrates themselves into the company.

They are stubborn, so you do not have to deal with CFO people, at least! Many people should be dismissed or retired several years ago!

If you have never heard of age discrimination (is this a word?), Let's let go of someone else to work on CFO when you are 70!

When the old timer is still there, the company can not grow, and many of them can not accept changes or accept!

• You may also be involved in the personal life of your employees. It helps to understand the private life of employees, but that has disadvantages. Employees may expect too much consideration, especially when needed urgently. Always define professional boundaries. No one will lead alone because of fear and love. The solution is to find the right balance by considering your own personality, person's personality, and the needs of a particular situation. Despite all the precautions, mistakes still occur, you should not be afraid to change the way, and if you do not apply it you should not love technology too much .

I think the effort to build a personal knowledge management system is beneficial to all. Today, we are faced with too much fragmented information. You must learn how to control information by converting high quality content into knowledge and discarding momentary and useless information. I have read a lot of articles, articles etc. And I saved lots of articles on my hard drive. Unfortunately, despite having spent a lot of time on various information, I gradually realized that I had no more knowledge. I have kept a lot of articles on this topic on my computer, but I do not remember examinating topics.

People have different levels of knowledge about topics. If someone wants to be a scholar, their reading is exhaustive, but this information is too much information so limited that it is the main "forest tree" syndrome. That is why this is Baac: the collapse of Japan and the revival of Paul Krugman 's liquidity trap. It is very clear, but it is written gently for reading, assimilation other than academic. He wrote and watched Japan's recession and liquidity traps several years ago by Paul Krugman, who detailed this in detail.

Chart of three personal, economic, and ecological requirements forming concentric circles. One of them can include others but not beyond your limit. She is personal. Likewise, economically urgent needs can not be associated with discussions in ecological demands unless they also offer economic benefits or can improve his or her personal situation . Therefore, one way to make people think about ecological changes is to attract economic or personal benefits. It is likely to help individuals or economically understand the argument "what they did for them", they linked to ecological changes and would carry out ecological changes