Too Much Dependence on Social Welfare in the US

Public funds are like holy water, and everyone helps. ~ To live in Italy, pursue liberty and happiness - these are nontransferable rights that our ancestors gave to our new country when drafting the Declaration of Independence, our country It is far from independence. Happiness is not a guarantee but a definition for each person and actively pursues their own tasks.

Most successful safety net programs and poor people arise from a more exclusive and racist era in our history. In the year of welfare and social security, 18 black people were murdered in the United States in 1935, and a law prohibiting rowing white and black together was passed. Lynch's law Roosevelt was enthusiastic about making any concessions so that they could maintain the power of blacks and women on the racist Dixiecrats he needed, and blacks and women aid It was considered not worth the price. In the first iteration of social security, approximately half of the US economic workers, including agriculture and domestic workers, were excluded. The categories at the time occupied 65% of all blacks of the labor force.

Today, most of our social welfare expenditure is spent on social security. Social security is the largest and most popular program on federal budget. Some people think social security is only a rapid growth and not other income transfer programs such as welfare. It's not. Poverty alleviation programs are also increasing. Over the past 50 years, the total amount of government spending (AFDC) to families with children has increased dramatically. Other public welfare projects show the same growth pattern. For example, a food fee program with a budget of less than $ 2 billion in 1970 currently has a budget of $ 23 billion. Today, about 25 million people are collecting food stamps - or one in almost 10 American people. Today, welfare is one of the fastest growing industries in the United States, with millions of broad Americans gathering government checks.