Today 's drug law Today' s drug law seems to be more harmful than good. The so-called drug war does not seem to be as effective as expected. Its initial purpose was to name it to attack drug problems in the United States. Nixon began a war with drugs to stop dealers that cause drug abuse in the late 1960 's. Another purpose of war with drugs is to show individuals involved in this misconduct that their participation could have serious consequences. From attacking the forefront of Colombian drugs, the government has taken radical measures to eliminate drugs from the streets of our country, until it causes massive drug crash in cities in the U.S. .
& Lt; Tab / & gt; In our legal system today's drug law is not considered. Given the widespread use of drugs and the number of people who violate the drug law, it may seem silly to think even though these laws were considered first. More than half of the prisoners of US Federal Prisoners are convicted for narcotics related crimes. (Www.csdp.org/factbook/prison.htm) The prison population has a great financial burden on society, but as long as the drug law still exists, people will continue to be imprisoned unnecessarily. The Canadian approach is to minimize administrative requirements, including marijuana complaints (the most common drug crime), and the United States forms a separate drug trial system aimed at reducing concerns about imprisonment Did. (Www.csdp.org/factbook/drugcourt.htm) The court was wasting time on drug litigation, but the real criminal action clearly did not receive the attention they deserved.
Today's federal narcotics law seems to have damaged marijuana, tightened with an inappropriate schedule, and banned directly. In fact, however, CSA is not a negative drug policy on cannabis. Conversely, a variety of other factors, primarily prejudiced parliamentarians are interfering with the normal operation of the law in medicine. In the government's most strict drug category schedule I, the first placement of cannabis can be regarded as a mistake. In particular, if alcohol and tobacco are excluded from the timetable, "wrong" may be too mild. Indeed, the rigid cannabis arrangement comes from cultural and ethnic indifference felt by activist Richard Nixon, who signed the regulated substance law as a law. Nixon 's aide stated that the war with cannabis is motivated racially and the oval office tape highlighted anti contrition movement and his disdain for minorities.