To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism by Evgeny Morozov

"The Internet is not a territory to be conquered, but life is maintained and it is allowed to develop freely."

"Why did Blockbuster shut down? Internet. Why was the movie canceled? Internet. Who toppled my lawn and ruined Petunia? Internet."

Today, "Internet" is almost what it is. "The next war on the freedom of the Internet may exceed 3D print." In August 2012, TechCrunch was a popular technology blog and its title was declared. Given the ambiguity of the concept of "Internet", the derivative concepts like "Internet freedom" are very comprehensive.

You will learn the best way of learning, please use safari. Unlimited access to video, online training, route learning, books, interactive tutorials etc

To save everything, here is an argument Morozov calls "resolutionism" and "Internet-centricism". "Solutionism" tends to assume that technology can effectively solve problems without unintended consequences ("unhealthy concerns about sexy, memorable and narrow solutions"), "Internet-centricism" All matters will be solved (Morozov will understand today's words "assume the Internet does not exist" that the concept of misunderstanding itself prevents truly understanding of the influence of technology "The explanation of how the digital platform works will be much better."

Yevgeny Morozov made a sharp and useful criticism of this idea, he called it "resolutionism." In solution, we need to focus on the problem of 'beautiful and clean technology solutions we can use'. In his book "Save All and Click Here", Morozov ridiculed the idea of ​​snow whether it is a thought experiment or a serious policy advice. (In fact, one of my concerns in writing this article is to think seriously about Snow 's thought, as many of the ideas Morozov writes in his book.

What could be the worst thing I read this year, and what did it tell me ... or could you design a social technical system that is not attractive?

Evgeny Morozov, one of the most important technical commentators today, criticizes the motive force other than Silicon Valley's innovation he calls "technical solutions". The basic idea is that many entrepreneurs in this field view technology or technology as the only solution to a specific problem or a series of problems. I recently saw a speech sponsored by the Annual General Assembly at the New Media Alliance of a boutique and marketing company. The CEO did not talk about the specific problems they had to solve. He agreed with the solution. Whatever the problem is, there may be an application. I feel a shock as this is an extreme and useful example of a technical solution. The solution is very good and the problem is irrelevant.