To lie or not to lie: resident physician attitudes about the use of deception in clinical practice

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION When fraud is used for patient care, physicians face conflicting values ​​of authenticity and good conduct. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the attitudes of residents to lies and to explore the reasons for reporting lies and lies.

METHODS: After acquiring the Institutional Review Board Review (OSR # 58013) and obtaining the exemption status from 2002 to 2007, doctors living in Lomarinda College gather to post on forum questions with the necessary online courses It was done. Responses were blinded and manually coded by two researchers using NVivo software. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Data via Links to Various Attributes 95% Analysis of Attribute Data Using Binomial Proportional CI

As a result of the survey, I found that the majority of residents (90.3%) reveal the truth about medical malpractice. Likewise, many residents (55.7%) will disclose the truth about the accident. In particular, it is a serious case that the mistake leads to medical malpractice (74.7%). However, many residents (40.9%) do not disclose almost missed events, as they believe that this will not affect the patient's health. Some residents (47.3%) will fraud the additional patient benefits to the insurance companies. Only a small percentage (4.2%) of those who think it is okay to tell a lie does not give a reason for selfishness.

Conclusion This study suggests that ethical issues related to fraud related to physicians at the residential level also exist. Residents are primarily for selfless reasons and are rarely for selfish or selfish purposes and may harm patients, insurance companies, and / or physicians themselves.

A lie is a statement that is intentionally used for fraud purposes. You can call a lie as a lie, and a person who is lying as a liar. Lies can be used to provide various instrumental, interpersonal or psychological functions to individuals using them. In general, the term "lie" has a negative meaning, and depending on the context, a person who tells a lie may be subject to social, legal, religious or criminal sanctions. Try to victims to believe in certain information already possessed by the victim or specific lies that may conflict with their common sense. It may succeed when the lie is big enough, as the victim is not willing to believe that such massive falsehood will actually be defended.

The lie started early. By the age of 3, most children know how to take that by 6 years, most children say it several times a day. Experts believe that children will learn to lie by observing their parents - they deceive the art by imitating their parents. Parents occasionally recommend explicitly telling the children. When a child asks that the gift is nice, the gift is the opposite. As a conclusion of a study, children may learn to lie as they learn to speak.

Conclusion This study suggests that ethical issues related to fraud related to physicians at the residential level also exist. Residents are primarily for selfless reasons and are rarely for selfish or selfish purposes and may harm patients, insurance companies, and / or physicians themselves.

Even if you are asked to lie to a patient, many doctors will want to prioritize as a priority, there may be serious diagnosis and prognosis. Many Western bioethicists have criticized this fraudulent act as infringement of autonomy of ancestral patients. However, compared to the example of this standard and criticism, it is desirable that it be more complex in morality and in other respects. I will focus on the common conflict that doctors, patients, and families want - conflict often reflects not only conflicting interests but also different levels of optimism, self-deception, and death. I consider various principles to reduce the need for such hope and fraud conflict.