In order to understand how rationality complements faith it is necessary to know how each piece of information works separately. The reason is "mode or behavior of thinking, and on the other hand, the ability of thinking, on the other hand, specifies elements of formal thinking such as planning, explanation, grounds." There are different reasons for humans and animals Aristotle once said that "people are reasonable animals." There is no reason why you can not understand the truth.
If you want to better understand the relationship between faith and reason, you must understand these two words more clearly. Christian thinkers use the word faith in various ways. It can refer to a belief shared by Christians ("Christian Faith"). The word faith sometimes refers to our response to God and promises of the gospel. This is that confession after reform means "to save faith" (eg WCF 14). This belief includes knowledge, consent, and trust. Finally, many philosophers and theologians use faith as a source of knowledge. As Caleb Miller explained, "The truth of faith is a fact known or legitimately believed by God's revelation, and it is reasonable based on what they are revealed by God."
The Baha'i faith god is taught as a personal god, but humans can not fully understand. Primitive understanding of a person in God is achieved through the revelation of the intermediate expression of His God. In the belief of Baha'i, the Christian doctrine such as the Trinity is seen as impairing Baha'i's view that God is single and unequal. The existence of Baha'i is a challenge to the ultimate Muslim teachings revealed by Muhammad. The God of Baha'i faith is communicated to mankind through the mediator of God (called God's appearance). These symptoms build religion in the world. Through these mediators of God, people can approach God, through which God brings God's revelation and law
The first thing to note about this reaction is its unusual effect on the nature of God's revelation. I believe that the traditional understanding of God's revelation suggests that if God told us we will reveal the truth of p to us. In another understanding considered, if God told us that p, he will not reveal the truth of p at all. Instead, he reveals something about himself. In other words, he wants us to believe in p. Furthermore, we must believe that the reason for p does not guarantee our beliefs. On the contrary, it is the reason to provide cautious and / or moral defense for our "beliefs". Suspicious responses make up God's revelation, as the command of God believes in p.