To Falsify or not to Falsify

Do not forge or counterfeit, consider the views of Greek and Greek science. Greek science is global science. The science of details tends to be overlooked. On the other hand, Hellenistic science is more mathematical and accurate. The transition of science from Greece to Hellenism is nothing but a change in the scientific point of view. Regardless of whether it is right or wrong, scientists' views changed and scientific changes followed. Quoting Kuen's words, "What this is, obviously makes temporary differences an inevitable conflict.

This is some important detail. The first is the difference between counterfeit claims and counterfeit claims. Mr. Popper said that scientific claims can be forged but pseudoscientific claim can not be forged. Forged evidence (which is stipulated as false) is definitely a counterfeitable claim (as it is said to have been forged). When allegations were forged, Popper stated that the right approach is to continue it and switch to another counterfeit claim. However, it does not mean that claims should not be part of science at first. Therefore, the idea that a planet orbits a circular orbit is not essentially a non - scientific assertion. In fact, it may be forged by observation, so it is just a kind of assertion that scientists should use. However, if observations indicate that this description is incorrect, the scientist will retire it and replace it with another forged claim.

Another attention to "counterfeit" - The fact that many attempts to counterfeit claims have failed does not mean that the claim is unverifiable. In this regard, the fact that the assertion is true does not make it unverifiable. If we can make specific comments to tell us that the claim is wrong, the assertion will be forged - if the claim is true the world does not have some observable ways I guess. Therefore, the description that Mars travels elliptical orbit around the sun may be forged by the observation that Mars moves through an orbit completely away from the ellipse.

I guessed. A testable idea that has not been forged. We can expand our understanding to some extent. The idea that the planet circulates the sun is the prediction that Kepler discovers the elliptical orbit of Mars from the Copernicus until we forge the assumption of the circular orbit, Newton follows the inverse square gravity and the hypothesis of this round Forged. The eccentric elliptical orbit of the comet made a final study of this theory by counterfeiting the assumption that the crystal ball of the planet was grasped.

We can disguise simulation hypotheses only under a reasonable set of assumptions about the external universe. If the particular format of the hypothesis is counterfeitable and counterfeit, people can move the goal post at any time to define an unbelievable external world than not being counterfeited. But if the outside world is incredibly wonderful than ours, why do you simulate the universe made up of such primitive, almost completely random and ordinary useless things . Rocks, and most importantly, do photons and dark matter pass through other open spaces?