To Err Is Human

As a pilot, every time an accident investigation reports, I am tired of hearing the word "human error". Almost all possible situations can be traced back to human errors in some way. The pilot can not start the correct emergency procedure and the pilot can not be stopped when it should be stopped and the pilot can not leave when he should leave. Look to the left when he should be seen correctly. It is almost easy to investigate the accident while flying at zero speed, and it is determined that there may be no accident that the pilot did something different.

Lewis Thomas 'Human Error', 'For people', Lewis Thomas in the article first compares the tendency of computer hypothesis and human error. "Our goal is to make mistakes and coding is wrong (306). Lewis uses persuasive elements to influence people's opinion, Thomas wrote as follows When a computer breaks down, they do not know what to do, but if a person makes a mistake, you can make the necessary improvements to get better errors or get the correct answer. All of us know from our personal experience that computers sometimes make mistakes.

Using a computer as a comparison of human thinking, Lewis Thomas' 'people oriented' emphasizes the importance of mistakes as a tool of action. He pointed out that the mistake is the reason to separate human thoughts from superhuman and electronic ideas. Computers have the ability to produce infinite accurate calculations, but still produce glitches and errors, and humans correct. He stated that the wrong trick is "a unique human gift" that should be used as a "guide to action." Thomas emphasizes the importance of mistakes as a motive for knowing - contrary to proper response - right.

Alexandru Pope (1688 - 1744) wrote famous as "Errors are people to forgive sacred people", but "Errors are human beings, people who confess the Holy See." Of course, Part of forgiveness is forgiveness. However, it seems to be impossible requirement to inform this to others in acceptance form. There are not many psychological literature on recognition of fraud. However, according to two recent studies on apology (2016) released by Ohio State University Roy Lewicki et al., You can infer that you should publicly approve your approval. Lewicki and his collaborators pointed out, "Media will make a high-profile apology almost everyday" (p. 177). Their research on factors constituting "good" apology comes from two sets of literature. One is a study of the transmission of apologies as a form of "image restoration".