Essay sample library > Tinker v. Des Moines: Students Are Entitled to Freedom of Expression of their views.

Tinker v. Des Moines: Students Are Entitled to Freedom of Expression of their views.

2024-01-15 15:35:19

In the winter of 1965, the Cold War reached its peak, the space race was full-fledged, and the Beatles became the world's most popular artist. At the same time, in Iowa, three children are planning to wear a black armband to school on December 17 to protest the ongoing Vietnam War. When the school authorities knew about the plan, they decided to punish those wearing the armband as a protest. When my parents decided to sue the school, it was one of the hottest debates at the time.

When you are wearing a school, the right for students to express freedom is limited. Article 1 of the amendment prohibits the enactment of laws against the freedom of the people. The US Supreme Court of Tinker vs. Des Moines Independent Community School District said, "It is hard to say that students or teachers are free from freedom of speech from constitutional rights or expressions at school gates" (procon.org ). 90% of the students said they did not want to wear uniforms. Robin Silverman, a child and adolescent development expert, told the NBC News. Today, students, especially girls, tend to compare each other's uniforms. Students do not like to wear the same things everyday. Ordinary students change from day to day, grow, and wear the same, so they will make them think that every life must provide the same every day (unr.edu)

At school we tell students to understand the Constitution of America and its revision. Everyone has the right to freedom of speech. For example, at Tinker vs. Des Moines Independent Community School (1969) the court stated that the freedom of speech at the school's school must be protected unless it significantly disturbs the subject matter requirements. In school environment this can be extended and extended to show personality through clothing. Making all students wear the same thing violates this right. It also suppresses students' self-expression, which is a strong demand for adolescence. Uniforms contrary to the character of young adolescents may encourage them to express themselves in more severe ways, such as body piercing, tattoos, and rebellious attitudes.