Timeless Persuasion

Andrew Marvel's "To his niece" seems to depict a young man trying to seduce his mistress, but Marvel considers the theme of time and uses the person carefully to defend the objections it creates . And that requirement for us. . Time is convincing through the impression of death, beauty, and death. This role highlights the ideas created by these impressions in order to affirm the idea that time flies, so we need to "catch this day". On the premise of poetry, Marvel realized a picture-like scene, young people can concentrate on enjoying their lover every day, asking "We are adding to the world" and the passage of time I tried to avoid it.

Analysis of these typical time attributes on the left shows that the relationship between the eternal opposition to the eternal duration and the eternal God and the world of time is not conclusive. Eternal God is temporary, but can exist in the world. He can have a lifetime, but it is not temporary. Therefore, critics of Stump and Kretzmann are correct as they believe that these attributes make their career time. Those with these attributes are usually temporary but not necessarily so.

Two aspects of sacred and eternal emphasis, emphasized by Stump and Kretzmann, are eternal life and life. There is a period in this life, but it is not a temporary period. The eternal life cycle contrasts the nature of this existence with the nature of abstract objects such as numbers and attributes. This view leaves the picture of our God as a kind of existence, and that life can not exist in any moment at once. The challenge to the defender of the eternal God concept is to explain how such God relates to current affairs. For example, God recognizes every moment directly. Since temporal simultaneity is a transitive relationship it is impossible to capture the relationship between his eternal cognition and his cognitive temporal subjects using a strict temporal relationship such as simultaneity . God knows the collapse of Rome forever, and now he knows my coffee spilled.

Many philosophers who discussed sacred time made their argument as follows: If God is eternal, the B theory of time must be true. But the B time theory is wrong. Therefore, God is not eternal. Those who keep the sacred and eternal philosopher take one of two ways. They accept the first premise to defend the B time theory (Helm 1988, 2001; Rogers 2000), or they oppose the second premise. Even though Spatiotemporalism is true, God can become eternal. In this case, they try to show that eternal God can know the fact of tension without changing himself. Some eternal supporters try to harmonize their views with the A theory, regardless of whether it is the time theory they have learned. Since the A theory is held more widely, it shows that the eternity of God's compatibility serves to strengthen the eternal global situation.