Time to Put an End to Affirmative Action

Affirmative action is a series of public policies and initiatives aimed at eliminating past and present discrimination based on race, skin color, religion, sex, nationality. Beginning with the "thirteenth revision", this "public policy" has a long history, it makes slaves illegal. The thirteenth amendment continues to guarantee equal protection under the law. The 15 th revision proposes to prohibit the racial discrimination from voting from the back.

Positive action: It should be fixed or terminated. Positive behavior is aimed at correcting the burden of unfair welfare distribution (status, income and wealth, power and power) and race and gender. Since the mid-1960s, the Federal government has promoted aggressive action when President Lyndon Johnson ordered federal contractors to take aggressive action plans. (Congress and state, 748). - As an administrative order carefully planned by President John Kennedy in the early 1960s, positive behavior, "active discrimination" was introduced into society. In those countries suffering from social, ethnic, gender and economic inequality at the time, they suffered from social, ethnic, gender, economic inequality.

In the 1960s and 1970s I witnessed actions that began to take positive actions or actions that equally provide equality discrimination opportunities. Most positive actions have proved to be controversial. One example is a compulsory school bus, and the children will take a bus to a school outside the normal school district and try to push them into the school system. Other examples of positive behaviors attempted in the 1970s and 1980s included the use of "quotas" (representing the proportion of groups) at public institutions and universities. Critics of positive behavior believe that actions taken to provide opportunities only to the resulting "reverse discrimination" or underrepresented groups do not address social illness. Fixed quota was eventually declared illegal

Positive behavior is always a controversial policy. Opponents condemn the positive behavior of setting group rights and setting quotas, neither of which is consistent with the American tradition. Advocates of positive behavior believe that the long-term history of group discrimination must take positive actions, and efforts to compensate for certain bad behaviors in the past are completely within the boundaries of federal government obligations .

Positive behaviors are the policy that the federal government, government agencies, or organizations develop to promote opportunities by joining unhappy communities. Through the execution of positive actions, historically excluded groups acquire strength and incentives in higher education and employment to explain their disadvantages in American society. The goal is to provide equal opportunities for everyone, as well as false promises. In 2012, a white woman, Abigail Fisher, filed a lawsuit against the University of Texas on "ethnic enlightenment policy". In the lawsuit, at the time, Louisiana State University student Fischer insisted that she refused imprisonment for her race and violated the 14th amendment. The Supreme Court sends this case back to the lower courts, and in 2014 the US Circuit Five Circuit Court of Appeals decided that UT could continue "all" enrollment procedures and positive action policies.