Time to Hit the Holy Books: Evolution and Intelligent Design in the Classroom

It is a discreet expression to argue that there is little conflict in the field of faith and reason. From the beginning of the scientific exploration, these two areas of thinking will be struggled only and will be relaxed only when the religion is gradually modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe. But like the essence of the ancient debate, the fire that caused this conflict was given again, again around the controversy over public school intelligent design.

In the process of advocating intelligent design promoting the introduction of intelligent design in public school science classes, the intelligent design movement center - discovery laboratory reviews evolutionary evidence based on its evolutionary critical analysis curriculum plan Arrange a hearing for you. The Kansas Evolution Hearing was a series of hearings held in Topeka, Kansas from May 5, 2005 to May 12, 2005. In the end, the Kansas Board of Education adopted an important analysis program on the evolution theory of the Institute, opposed the opposition of the National Board of Directors Science Hearing Committee, and participated in the campaign campaign on behalf of conservative Republican candidates. On August 1, 2006, 4 out of six conservative Republicans approved the classroom standard of "evolutionary analysis" and lost their seats in the primary. The definition of science is restricted to "seeking a natural interpretation of what is observed in the universe" again.

Intelligent Design vs. Evolution is a new high risk game. Intelligent design is a theological answer to mainstream science, Darwin's evolution is an atheistic creation story. Intelligent design allows meaning and purpose, but evolution is a story that achieves everything through a step-wise and unguided process of random change and adaptation. Almost every article or television program that covers every aspect of nature, from chimpanzee diet to human dream today, must mention "our evolutionary heritage". More importantly, these phenomena have adversely affected Darwin's health condition. Homosexuality and altruism are increasingly retroactive to some evolutionary advantages. As a researcher, writer, or philosopher, he has to pay homage to Darwin, no matter how fragile he is with Darwin.