Three Strikes and You’re Out

We live in the world of law, regulation and regulation. This society must enforce all of these in order to prevent the country from falling into complete confusion. Some laws may cause many controversies and arguments. Specifically, three strikes and you go out. There are many people who insist on this law and oppose it. Many people's statements say it is unfair and unfair, while other people say that it is necessary for our society to protect against professional criminals .

A recently published book, "Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You in California", reports the most comprehensive "three strike" studies so far. According to the findings of the author, the crime rate continues to decline before the "third strike", and the crime rate continues to decline at almost the same rate even after "three strikes". It's small. it's the best. A part of the book, partly because "three strikes" are invested in such a wide network, criminals arrested according to that provision are larger than those who are not "three strikes" There is a high possibility that it is not a criminal who did. They are also unlikely to commit a violent crime

In 1994, the vast majority of California voters approved "3 strikes" ("3 strikes, you are out"). The law stipulates that at least two criminals who committed serious or violent crimes must be approved. She was sentenced to 25 years imprisonment following the third conviction. According to the Los Angeles Times newspaper, there are currently about 8,900 prisoners issuing three rulings. According to the data of prisons, about 70% of prisoners in prison say that demand for drug abuse treatment is high.

Three strikes have spread nationwide since the symbolic adoption of the "three strikes and you go out" judgment guide in California in 1994. Later, the federal government and most US states have enacted or expanded similar enforcement penal code and customary criminal controls (Dickey) and Hollenhorst, 1999). On the surface, the early drop in the overall crime rate is the reason for three strikers. However, many researchers have attributed the majority of this phenomenon to existing trends unrelated to the law, claiming that the entire region of North America experienced a general recession in the 1990s (Eskridge, 2004, pp. 15-23).

Evaluation of the impact of "Three Strike" Act on California State and Washington State Crime Rates and Prison Population

The most common mandatory minimum penalty applies to habitual or recidivism. This includes policies of "three strikes and your withdrawal" taken by 25 states between 1993 and 1995. Three strikes usually require imprisonment against customary offenders or perpetrators, but the number and type of offenses committed by the three strikes and the duration of imprisonment vary from state to state. Many states decided that mandatory minimum penalties apply to dangerous criminals. This reflects the goal set out in the Principles section, which is designed to protect the public.