Three Portrayals of Climate Change

Three depictions of climate change 'You are what you eat' All of us have heard this old word. Similar axioms may apply to other things that we accept, such as information. Of course, it is not the same meaning as "you are what you read, what you heard, and / or what you see", but it works the same way. But in another distinction between people and food, (P1) creative artists will use various techniques to influence the perception method of what we are communicating to them.

The US view on climate change is embarrassing. We are one of three countries (Syria and Nicaragua are other countries) who refused Paris' climate agreement, and it is the only country officially refusing climate science. Republicans should be particularly embarrassed, as they are responsible for the position of the US negativist. I hope that this is a marginal position - Democrats are easy to dismiss because they pretended that their position is partisan and chose media and selfish lobbyists. But it is on party platform. The Republicans picked James Inhofe, the last chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, carried snowballs to the floor of the Senate and silently said that in the winter they are countering decades of climate data. Republicans elected the President who calls mischief climate change and asked denier to take responsibility for the Environmental Protection Bureau.

Three years ago, I was angry about climate change. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection prohibits writing the phrase "climate change" even after Florida Governor Republicans claim "not true" - but I was on the left. Anger is not so excited. I have read Naomi Klein 's "change all" new book. Despite the "time is tough", she guarantees the reader that it will take 10 years to fundamentally rebuild the world economy and prevent global temperature rise. By the end of the century two degrees Celsius or more. Klein is not the only one who told us we have been in ten years. In fact, environmentalists also said the same thing in 2005.