Thoughts

The strange thing about Tolstoy is that he was killed by confusion and life. He said if he did not know the way he lives or how to do something. Eventually they left, but those moments came back. The arrest of life always appears in this question: why. Then, I think that the confusion of Tolstoy is in the phrase "Why ... then?" Dealing with his view on life and death. Explain why some of why he should do something in his life.

Thought is nothing but a series of thinking. There are two kinds of thinking "conscious thinking" and "compulsive thinking". If you started thinking about the school day when you read this article, you will have encountered an obsessive thinking. "I will comply with the following obsession. If it emerges ... I will observe the following obsession ... Once it emerges ... Wow, Wow, Wow, Wow, Wow, Wow WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, WOW, When it appears ....... Yesterday my boss told me to be smart, he is such a douchebag ... Oh, if it appears, I should protect this Is an idea ... "etc.

What is going on here? Even if you are about to sit for a million years, you can not observe the origin of obsession. why? "The next mandatory idea to observe when it emerges" is special, but since this is just an idea, our hardware can not entertain multiple ideas at the same time. Therefore, the idea never observes another idea in real time. But wait, who is the observer here? If this idea is doing this type of observation business what is "you" doing? Yes, for all practical purposes, "you" is nothing but this special idea. . And, for the code that constantly creates these obsession, I call it "iCode".

The truth of things is taken into account, that is, their real existence is considered to be. Since thinking is a thinking that produces thinking, it is not merely the name of a symbol or word, it is an activity, so we must point out that thought and thought are closely related. In this sentence the word "I think" means that the idea is a past idea. This unification will be presented as an important aspect of the future. It is important to note that the identity and the identity of existence is not an ideological characteristic of my mind, it is not the object of the external entity of the world. Hegel is not a subjective idealist here. He did not place the real existence of the world under the sympathy of personal or universal consciousness. The truth of facts is in fact considered not so strange, it is not too violent against our common notion.