Thorndike's 'Law of Effect': Operant Conditioning

Operational conditions are based on Sundec's "Law of Effectiveness". (McLeod, 2014) This is very basic. According to the educational portal of the website, according to "the law of effect", if we get paid, we will do it more frequently. (Goodfriend, 2014) Operating conditions use "law of efficacy". Essentially, rewarding someone positively will increase the possibility of redoing it. Proactive enhancement is to reward someone for doing a good job. Negative enhancement is to enhance the result of making a bad choice or to give a result.

Discovery of the sundeck had a great influence on the development of behaviorism. B. F. Skinner is based on the law of efficacy by the theory of his driving conditions. Skinner developed his own version of the puzzle box, which he referred to as the Operation Coordination Room (also known as the Skinner box). Under operational conditioning, strengthening of action is strengthened, and immunity is weakened. The law of effect clearly has a great influence on the development of behaviorism, which became the dominant ideology of psychology in the majority of the 20th century.

Skinner is considered the father of Operator Conditioning, but his work is based on Thorndike (1898) validity law. According to this principle, actions with pleasant results may be repeated, and behaviors with unpleasant consequences are unlikely to be repeated. We actively strengthen our actions by strengthening the results of individual discovery fees. For example, if your teacher gives you 5 pounds (ie rewards) each time you complete the assignment, in the future you will likely have a higher likelihood of repeating this behavior.

Skinner's operational adjustment theory was developed based on the Sandyk effect rule. Sandeck stated that human behavior is "conforming to results" (Skinner, quoted in 1953). Skinner (1954) emphasizes the principle that "effects occur and they occur under conditions that are most suitable for producing so-called changes" (p. 87). The influence that actions have on people determines the possibility that it will recur or the possibility of being destroyed. Therefore, the good influence of a certain action causes that person to do so again, and the bad result encourages it to reject it.