Thoreau, King, & Goldman on Unjust Laws

A systematic government is a government approved by the people it controls. This system is used to protect people and provide essentials for prosperity. However, many people believe that the government should not interfere with economic and political problems for most of the time. This type of government is called the active government and can be called the "big government." Transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau, civil rights activist Dr. Martin Luther King, and political anarchist Emma Gaman insisted that they had the right to break the public unjustifiable law against the government.

Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther Luther King were in violation of unfair legislation law in his famous article "Letters from Birmingham Prison". As in the guide, Henry David Thoreau wrote in his famous article "civil disobedience" that people should do what their conscience told them rather than obey unfair laws. The position of the two writers is very close; they use a common theme of conscience, and they use a similar rhetically appealing spirit.

Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr., in addition to the increase in the religious belief of the king, express their views in different ways, even though citizens' disobedience and fair and unfair I did the same view on how to handle the law. . Both authors believe that laws contradictory to their conscience should be respected, but they will still be challenged passively. To prove this belief, Thoreau and Kim both practiced this on their own.

Disobedience of citizens is resistance to unfair law. Henry David Thoreau caused this revelation when he wrote "civil disobedience". In writing Birmingham Municipal Prison Letter, Dr. Martin Luther King used several Thoreau ideas to expand the concept of civil disobedience. Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. use the citizen's disobedience as a way to improve the law and require society to comply with higher morals, but in today's society, Do not obey the law used to change Society lowers their ethical standards

The king abides by the law and uses conscience as a guide for breaking the unfair law. How close is he to Henry David Thoreau's position? Do you think that the king read Thoreau's "civil disobedience" as an important document about morality and immorality? Compare and contrast the positions of the two writers. Martin Luther King and Henry David Thoreau have the same idea and I think they have very close conviction. For everything that is not violent, the king wants peace among all supporters, and ultimately I want to tell it to everyone. I think that the king read Thoreau's "civil disobedience" as an important document about morality and immorality and I think that both have a wonderful education. If the king read it, I think he thinks that Thoreau has similar beliefs and may truly encourage him.