This question can constructively be answered either

In support of the claim that religion is basically the same, students can point out the influence of Zoroastrianism like Judaism, Christianity, Islam, or the influence of Judaism on Christianity and Islam I can do it. . Students can also notice the similarities of traditions, such as similarities between Buddhism and Christianity, highlighted in this chapter. To emphasize the differences, students can even point out differences in cultural traditions, such as the belief that Hinduism and Buddhist beliefs are separate. Students can also point out important differences between different cultural traditions, such as the concept of God in Jewish and Christian traditions, the difference between Brahman in Indian tradition and Taoism in Chinese tradition I will. You can also notice the difference between Greek philosophy, Confucianism philosophy, and supernatural tradition. Is the secular view of the world essentially a contemporary phenomenon, or is there a precedent for the classical era? The philosophical system of China and Greece is at the center of every possible answer. In China, lawyers have some features of modern secular political philosophy in relying on law and law enforcement agencies to secure a stable society. The main theme of Confucian teachings is clearly secular and practical. Confucianism is focused on interpersonal relationship and effective harmony of government and society. Greek thought emphasizes debate and logic, ruthless questions to accepted wisdom, beliefs for human reasons, and enthusiasm for confusing the world without much mentioning God, and also the world To provide a precedent for modern secular views. "Religion is a double-edged sword that supports political authority and social elite and damages it." How do you support both sides of this statement? In answering this question, students must consider what religion is, not what religion is. Although students can realize that philosophy can support and threaten political authority and social elite (like religion), rationalism of lawyers, Confucianism and Greece should be reserved. Legalism and Confucian traditions primarily support political authority and social elite, Greek rationalism seen in the death of Socrates may threaten political and social elite. In order to support political and social authority, students can point out the personal situation of elite adopting new and popular religion at any time. Ashoka provided another support for the Achaemenian dynasty to Zoroastrianism, an example of conversion to Buddhism in Mauryan, India. Finally, the adoption of Christianity by Constantine and the ultimate strengthening of patriarchy by Christianity shows political and social support that new religions can provide an established power structure.

Ideally, Saeed's book is designed to answer this question, but in this context (in the first chapter) the problem is rhetorical. Is this sentence a rhetorical question or an unresolved question? Is not it both? In the first chapter, it means rhetoric - it is meant to convince the reader that the author tries to answer the question or that the reader can answer the question at the end of the book. But in the context of the whole book it is a statement on the unresolved issue of race and advantage and statements on how each person defines themselves and the people around him. We hoped not to recognize these things, but did not they say that? (I am not you ... Please wait) Can we discuss whether this approach and its roots stop this way?

This question can be answered constructively: • To support the same argument of religion, students are influenced by Zoroastrian influences such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam, or Judaism against Christianity and Muslim You can point out the effect of. • Students can also notice the similarities of traditions, such as similarities between Buddhism and Christianity, highlighted in this chapter. • To emphasize the difference, students can even point out differences in cultural traditions, such as the belief that Hinduism and Buddhist beliefs are separate. • You can point out important differences in intercultural traditions such as the concept of God in Jewish and Christian traditions, the difference between Brahman in Indian tradition and Taoism in Chinese tradition. • Students can also notice the difference between Greek philosophy, Confucianism philosophy, and supernatural philosophy tradition. twenty three