Third Party Intervention in Civil Conflict

Third-party intervention in the civil war, especially in today's society, includes civil war and violence far beyond those including external attacks and conflicts. These domestic conflicts regarding identity, territory and government are more difficult to resolve through peaceful negotiations, thereby enhancing collective sense of responsibility for recognition. Failure to properly process may worsen the situation and may lead to tensions and (perhaps) executions. The use of third parties (military intervention) in the civil war often causes suffering of the people, bringing significant cost to serious damage and assistance of the country.

There are few studies that have examined how third parties can affect the occurrence of civil war and the recognition of third parties concerning behavior of third parties. The civil war in America is a war almost ignored by civil war scholars, how the expectation of third-party intervention influences the decision-making process of the target country, and the possibility of third-party intervention We will clarify how it affects recognition. And upgrading the civil war. The American Civil War is a particularly interesting case to explore the role of third parties in the beginning of the civil war. Because the American Civil War here is different from most cases considered in existing civil war literature, because a third party (power of Europe) is here. In all cases, there is no contradiction, but it is still important.

How will the fear of intervention affect the behavior of civil war participants? From the literature on preventive war you can see that opposition by foreign intervention could lead to government violence against rebel factions. This suggests that civil war interventionists have to look more widely on how third parties will affect conflict. Most state war scholarships are considering how external parties will affect ongoing civil war, but in order to examine how external parties will affect the onset of civil war There is little work on.

How does the fear of foreign intervention have on the behavior of civil war participants? I believe that the government will attack rebels by fear of third party intervention. This proposition is in stark contrast to the current national war scholarship. It is not because the current literature ignores the influence of intervention. On the contrary, many studies are exploring the impact of intervention on the period of civil war and how the intervention leads to war spread to neighboring countries 10.

In cases where the parties to the dispute can not solve the problem themselves, third party intervention is a possible means to resolve the deadlock and produce an acceptable solution. Mediators can play a variety of roles. They can act as hosts, observers, facilitators, formulators, educators, operators or supporters. Mediators can be selected based on reputation, skills, knowledge, or resources. Arbitrators have their own motivation to participate in the negotiation process and sometimes have their own agenda. In spite of prejudice, it is widely believed that mediators must stay neutral to the parties to the conflict. Their participation as intermediaries is based on the trust of all parties to the dispute. You can terminate mediator participation at any time during the negotiation process