They are who/whom we dislike.

This answer is largely based on comments on the deleted question "Who am I, what he likes?" BillJ is particularly useful

Mr. Edwin Ashworth says he can not hear so well, suggesting that "they are dislikes of us." (Cognitive English Grammar, by GünterRadden, RenéDirven)

However, if the sentence is interpreted as an answer to the question "Who dislikes you", that sentence is grammatical. In other words, pronouns are used not as fusion synonyms but as "question dependent words".

The latter is correct in traditional grammar, but the example you wrote is very good. The phrase "he / who loves who" is a suspicious sub-phrase complementing "yes". That means "I am the answer to the question" Who / who loves him. " I understand that the reference to "I" is the same as he loves.

In the example of OP, pronouns do not have preceding pronouns (m). This indicates that who (m) needs to be question dependent rather than relative pronoun. Instead of related terms, indirect question Normally (although not necessarily) the lower question contains an expression "answer to question", so OP says "I am a response to a question" /

Is not the answer you are looking for? Tag grammar Pronouns see other questions about people or other people asking questions

"Do you have many people of us collide with other people. And, how much do you pray for the people is this person of? We have the men and women, were actively Even if Lincoln could pray passionately - a modern experience shows that to him - how much can people who oppose him do to what they can do? and betrayal is a characteristic of the enemy, often it is also the intention of skilled allies to fail, but still, because they are to emphasize that you have the annoying brand love, a thorn in the crown of your Push it in your body. "

First of all, there is no troll. Let's understand it. No one thinks that he is a "troll". This is the name we only give to groups of ambiguous people, people who can not agree with us, or we dislikes you. Ambiguity does not help solve trolling problems, but it is most useful. Online communication is a good equalizer. You may be talking to any social class, but you may not know what you are talking about. In the "real world" there is all the information that will help to build a social hierarchy. We use this information to locate our position in social exchanges and act accordingly. How is this person? Are they tall? Are they stronger than me? Do they belong to a higher social class? Should I respect him?