Theories of Power

When discussing topics of force leadership, the inevitable concept is power. For many people, power is not fun because it relates to corrupt, dominant and powerless exploitation of power. However, it is worth noting that when electricity is used responsibly, it benefits society in various ways. Power can be defined as the possibility or ability to influence others' decisions in political, social, or economic areas (Rothman 425).

The theory of power dependence is the name of social exchange theory originally proposed by Richard Emerson (1972). Dynamics of the theory develops mainly on the power, the use of power, and the balance of power, and depends on the central concept of dependence. Interdependence increases people's possibilities by unifying people ... The label "practical theory" emphasizes the everyday nature of behavior The method of social and cultural theory in the second half of the 20th century Performance, dependence on tacit knowledge, and implicit understanding. . In addition, these methods highlight the 'material' features of behavior and culture.

D. Proximity / depression theory, developed by Keltner and his colleagues, assumes that having power and using power will change the individual's mental state. This theory is based on the concept that most organisms respond to environmental events in two general ways. Methodological correspondence and behavior, self improvement, seeking rewards, increasing energy and exercise are involved. Conversely, deterrence is related to self-defense, meaning threats and dangers, alertness, loss of motivation, and avoidance of overall activity.

Power balance is one of the oldest and most fundamental concepts of international relations theory. Although there are many changes in the interpretation of the theory and concept of power equilibrium, they are based on the minimum trend and maximum of the recursive equilibrium model of the law. According to this model, imbalances and concentration of military and material capacities among the great powers were examined, and the balance was restored to ensure the existence of a major power in the international system. There are several mechanisms for the main power which can regain equilibrium. For example, internal military buildup, conversion to economic wealth's military power, formation of a balanced coalition, transfer of equilibrium to other countries, division and compensation of peace reconciliation after the war, and emulation. The equilibrium of the people depends on the distribution of competence among the great powers