Theories of Aggression

Aggressive theory "It was reported that 23 people died before the two girls of the Colorado School died in a siege battle." When guns and explosives entered school, they shocked the country and killed classmates and teachers before committing suicide. The story of such casual violence and attack often plagues the media. Recent national attention focuses on the murder in Colorado state, but history revealed countless other similar aggressive crimes against innocent people.

a) Outline of two theories of aggressive psychology (12 points) b) Evaluation of the two aggressive theories outlined in a) according to the related research (12 points) a) a review of the theory of two aggressive psychology and Evaluation (24 points) attack is an example of antisocial behavior. It is defined as "any form of behavior designed to harm or cause harm to other creatures motivated to evade such damage". The theory of psychosocial attack explains these attacks caused by social interaction.

Social psychologists believe that aggression arises primarily from the internal motives of people who are trying to hurt others. Various theories of aggression show this theory. These theories suggest that external conditions such as frustration seem to motivate people to cause other harm. This aggressive drive tends to lead to attacks on the body. What is best known among these theories is frustration - the hypothesis of attack suggests that frustration brings about the awakening of driving that the purpose is to harm people or things. In addition, theory suggests that recession is the strongest, perhaps the only cause of attack (Baron & Branscombe, 2012)

First of all, the theory that supports attack theory from the viewpoint of learning is "frustration-attack hypothesis" proposed by John Dollard (1939). Frustrated attack theory shows that frustrating is the main cause of attack. For example, when a person gets frustrated, it may instantly show aggressive behavior. According to this assumption, the attack occurs only due to backlash, and no other special factors occur. In addition, according to Glassman (2000), the degree of attack presented is purely dependent on the degree of frustration of a person. For example, if a child is prevented from taking action or holding something, the child will be aggressive.