The Zoo Controversy Essay

Everyone has been to the zoo; they eat penguins, they like dolphin show. The zoo has been part of American culture for centuries. At first, the zoo can be regarded as a cell of an animal, but today the zoo is changing rapidly. The cage, which was once restricted, is currently revolutionizing the land of one acre where various species inhabit. Opponents in the zoo believe that they are inhumane and harmful to animals. However, the zoo has various reasons such as protection of animals, propagation under breeding, scientific research, health care, education, etc. Daniel Martin, author of mailonline.com, has written an article about labor charity minister Angela Smith. Show more

Today, animals in zoos are kept in clean, vast land. According to Time magazine article, the San Diego Zoo spent 5 million dollars to build fake forests for 5 bears (Gibbs). The exhibition includes trees, waterfalls and even electronic honey dispensers. According to this article, "Lively green exhibition in this summer, zoo people like it, they cut down trees and roll the turf" (Gibbs). Many zoos are not small cages, most people spend a lot of money to keep the facilities in their original condition, not foul odors that they keep in the zoo. The habitat of animals now grows larger than ever, and more importantly, it is being cleaned many times a day, like regular feeding of animals. This further demonstrates that this zoo has greatly improved the entry level zoo related to most people. Contrary to what Smith thinks, the zoo is actually very good for animals, and one of the main reasons is the conservation of zoo species. Since the beginning of the middle of the mid-nineteenth century in Europe, the zoo has been greatly improved; at the time the zoo was only for entertainment, and now the zoo owners are more aware and concerned about their animal welfare ( Masci). As the list of threatened species is increasing year by year, scientists must know the number

Modern people are familiar with the zoo because the zoo is where most people know about wildlife and the natural environment. Along with the improvement of living standards, zoos are necessary facilities in the city. But the controversy over whether to shut down the zoo is getting more and more serious. The purpose of this article is to find a solution to this problem. Supportive opinions and dissent opinions are discussed and finally conclusions are drawn

Earlier this week, I contacted Copenhagen Zoo and asked Bengt Holst about the controversy at the Odense Zoo. On a business trip to Holst, I was led to a page on the website of the zoo that he wrote. The main paragraph extracted here explains that the European zoo focuses on the health of the group, not individual animals. I think this is a good sign. The most important factor is that all of them can live a good life whether the animal's body and behavior are healthy and whether life is long or short lived. This is what the Copenhagen Zoo strongly believes. "