The World Needs Wikileaks

WikiLeaks said on the company's website, "I will continue to empower and help Wikileaks open up the government." Since 2006, WikiLeaks has been called an organization that provides government secrets to people. After the first launch, we released 2 million documents in the first year. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assanji said WikiLeaks is an international nonprofit organization that publishes private, secret, and confidential media documents from anonymous sources and news leaks. Julian Assange is described as the first start of WikiLeaks, but it has founder of technical experts from several countries including Chinese dissidents, journalists, mathematicians, and United Sta

Then another question in my mind: "Does the world need WikiLeaks?" This is a moral matter in turn. As I mentioned earlier, WikiLeaks fully announces the authenticity of the file without any editorial changes. This is a thorn of many journalists and can not be expressed in some countries. WikiLeaks consciously uses traditional media. This is also necessary to make it possible to read the original data from WikiLeaks. Traditional media covers only a part of the document, the most interesting part. Therefore, this problem has been clarified. Yes, we need WikiLeaks. This is because there is no judgment on everything that this organization exposes. Meanwhile, in order to observe the ethics and laws of each country, it is necessary to clarify whether it is not necessary to blacken the name, address, and telephone number.

This is only one of the hundreds of vulnerabilities that WikiLeaks has published over the past decade. WikiLeaks issues confidential documents on governments, international companies, and individual global leaders around the world. Every time there is a leak, WikiLeaks is increasingly controversial. Of course, since WikiLeaks has released confidential information, the organization to which the file belongs is the main critic of WikiLeaks and its behavior. WikiLeaks critics believe that media sources are disclosing stolen information, which endanger the stability and security of governments and companies around the world.

WikiLeaks does not pose a threat to the masses. The only person who can hurt by WikiLeaks is strong and corrupt, and the Pierre Omidyar intercepted is undoubtedly. Among the articles published in the Atlantic Omidyia made ridiculous criticism against WikiLeaks. First Amendment There is a possibility of "losing" protection (not one thing). Never trust billionaire