The Working Class Republican

In the book of forgotten "forgotten people", political analysts believe that conservative idol Ronald Reagan is not the enemy of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and New Deal, but he is truly The ultimate savior of heirs and popular shows

Traditional political wisdom keeps the two most important presidents of the 20th century - Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan - as the opposite of ideology. Roosevelt was welcomed as the advocate of progressive advocacy of the great deal in New Deal. Reagan is seen as a conservative fighter dedicated to a small government and free market. However, Henry Olsen thinks this assumption is wrong.

In the Republican working class, Olson believes that historical records clearly show Franklin Roosevelt and New Deal itself are more conservative than Democrats and Republicans, and Ronald Reagan is most modern I understand more than Republicans understand. For progress. Until the successor of President Roosevelt lost his vision in the 1960s, Olson broke off political myth and created a record that revealed many years of Democrat Reagan. Inherit the basic promise of New Deal: All Americans deserve comfort, dignity, and respect as long as they do their best

Olson fixed the erroneous assumption that drives today's politics. He stated that the conservative Republican political victory over the past 30 years is not a refusal of the New Deal's commitment, but a representative of the voter's desire for their success - the Americans said that this is a country's vision of nation-building I believe it is realization. For the benefit of all citizens and Republicans, he asked Republicans to become a party of "Ross conservative" once more - rediscovering the basic elements of the Roosevelt (and Reagan) vision To support

We traditionally believe that Republicans / Democrats have a difference between "ruling class" and "working class" or "1% vs. 99%". Democrats are believed to faithfully represent the interests of the working class. Republicans have succeeded in maintaining their competitiveness with suspicion of acquiring torches of the wealthiest rich people and winning working-class votes. They are doing this by making use of economic ignorance and racial prejudice of low-information worker-class voters. This model has a lot of truth about the Republican explanation, but the Democratic Party wrinkles to ignore this pattern.

Democrats generally think that poor, working-class Republicans "oppose their interest in voting". Thus, Democrats mean that some low-income Americans are supporting politicians who want to reduce welfare and lower the rich taxes. "We want to help them, Republicans want to hurt them - they have to vote for us." This chart underestimates the distribution effect. Every trump-care method abolishes a lot of Obama care taxes, but the biggest one is an additional charge of 8% for family household capital increase for family with annual income of $ 250,000 (personal income $ 200,000) . The wealthiest Americans make the most of their investment, which means that most of the economic benefits of cardiac medicine will reach up to 0.1% of households (minimum annual income: $ 1.7 million; average annual income : $ 6 million)

As an expert in business and economic development, I know that middle class families and small businesses benefit from simpler and more competitive tax laws. Unfortunately, today's legislation approved by the Republican Party in Congress is actually a tax hike for millions of middle-class families and not enough for small and medium-sized enterprises. This is two reasons I voted against it. At the beginning of this process, I told my colleagues in the political arena that the middle class took a day off and was willing to prepare a tax plan to actually allow companies to create employment. Republicans did not cooperate with the Democratic Party to create bipartisan bills but rather to implement a bill that provides significant tax cuts to wealthy Americans while giving little or no relief to other countries I chose.