The Western Formula

At the Western border, it seems that the traditional approach is that John Kawerti evaluated Six Gun Mistique. His explanation in Western style is "easy to define than a detective story", which may be an example of many writers clearly, but it is not special to Steven Crane. Kawelti's standards for successful Westernism are minimal in thought, but are related at the same time. Cranes expressed different views on these standards.

The Cavitis Western formula strongly assumes that men are confident and that women are few. He is standardizing Western blacks and whites. There is a clear struggle between good and evil, and violence can only solve this problem. The position of Jane Tompkins on the West seems to be the midpoint between Cavisti and Klein. She recognizes that violence is the central theme of the West, but it also explains how we see violence. In this era, our society has banned violence as a means of problem solving - the crane did not follow this directly in his story, but it definitely questioned it. On the other hand, Kawelti sees violence as the only answer - another black and white plot

At the Western border, it seems that the traditional approach is that John Kawerti evaluated Six Gun Mistique. His explanation that the Western style "easier to define than a detective story" is clearly an example for many writers, but not for Steven Crane. Kawelti's standards for successful Westernism are minimal in thought, but are related at the same time. Cranes expressed different views on these standards. The idea of ​​using a Western style crane is a mere Western approach, from the setup of introduction to a rough smile that denim will make to others. These are actually unrelated to the Kawaruti Western formula. Klein's departure from the Western style means his intrinsic solution to human existence and morality - our ethical principle of success