The Washington State Three-Strikes Law

It is difficult to judge whether Washington's Three Shot method is a valid legislation. In 1993, Washington was the first state in a country that adopted three strike laws to enforce life imprisonment without being convicted on the third specific felony felony. Diane Ballasiotes was promoted by a widely known dead who was raped and murdered by a rapist who was convicted released from prison. Voters were emotionally excited about the atrocities of felonies released and gained a 3: 1 advantage.

Washington State is the first country to enact the "3 strike" Act in 1993. Since then, in addition to the federal government, more than half the states have issued three strikes laws. The main focus of these laws is to stop repeat offenses (a few criminals repeat the crime). The California State Law was revised significantly in 2012, but it is considered to be the most influential and most commonly used law in the state. There are many ways to develop these laws across states, no matter how "strikes" are defined and how many strikes are required.

In 1994, California, following the leadership of Washington, signed three law strike laws known to Californians. Through all campaigns and publicity over the law, it is overwhelmingly welcomed by the legal system. The purpose of the law is to prolong the time to repeatedly imprison criminals, mainly in violent crimes or serious crimes. As a result, the correction system already felt the influence of the law on the prison. - The United States accounts for only 5% of the world's population, accounting for more than 2 million prison prisoners in every four people. In the past decade, the drug war has filled many states and federal prisons with numerous prisoners. Construction of a new prison is not an answer to prison overcrowding. Due to economic tension, the United States has no funds and can not solve this problem at all.

To ensure that repetitive offenders are continually imprisoned, the state has implemented three strikes laws. Logic is that public offenders can not harm someone when a criminal is in prison. As the three strike laws apply to defendants who committed multiple crimes in succession, the purpose of these laws is to ensure that criminals are most likely to commit crimes in jail. The biggest criticism of the three strikes is that the punishment for the crime arrested by the accused is often disproportionate. For example, according to three strikes, a defendant who stole a videotape may be sentenced to 25 years in prison sentence. If three strikes were not made, the same defendant can only spend months in order to cope with the same crime.