The Warren Court

The Supreme Court of the United States was established under Article 3 of the Constitution and has the ultimate authority to interpret the Constitution, so it is considered the Supreme Court (USSC). The Supreme Court consists of the Supreme Court and eight judges. The Supreme Court plays an important role in the legal system of the United States, as its judgment becomes the law and thereafter affects litigation nationwide.

In the 1960s, the Warren Supreme Court court led by Prime Minister Warren announced a number of rulings to fulfill the proper procedural model of the criminal justice system. This model emphasizes the possibility of causing errors at the test stage. Therefore, even if it hinders the operation of the legal system with the highest efficiency, it emphasizes the necessity to protect the rights of the procedure. There is no model that can explain the reality in a completely satisfactory way, but the Warren Court's decision in the field of criminal law applies a relatively strict and reasonable process model to the judicial process. As stated above, the following provision of the rights provision is incorporated into the provision of the proper procedure of the 14 th revision, the state provides criminal defendants with a number of constitutional safeguards that are accused periodically to the accused It is requesting to do. Federal guilty people.

Regarding domestic criminal proceedings, the problem begins with the protection of criminal proceedings in the Supreme Court 's Constitution, the 14th Revision Bill of Rights Convention. This process was mainly done in the Warren Court and expanded the monitoring of the state court proceedings by the federal court. As early as 1953, Secretary of State Frankfurt warned the warrant "Potential of evil and good and evil" on about 400 to 500 personal protection claims filed by the state in the federal court. By the end of the Warren Court, this number has increased to 12,000 per year. It continued to rise until the Renquist Court of the 1990s confined the flood

Since the 1960 's, the court has changed from the ratio of Warren Court Justice. As shown in Table 5, the six Warren Court Judges (Brian, Warren, Brennan, Marshall, Photos, Douglas) are more likely than the judges of the most liberal Renquist judge in criminal trials. Stevens) is even more free. . In contrast, the five Renquist judges (Renquist, Thomas, Scalia, O'Connor, and Kennedy) are more conservative than the most conservative Warren court judges (Caucasians).

The judicial system focuses on the correction of young offenders, which is quite different from the adult system, which places greater emphasis on punishment.