The War on Terrorism and the US Propaganda Machine

The terrorist war and the totalitarian regime of the American propaganda machine are dominating their people by fighting them and imprisoning them. Critics of the Western society argue that the democratic government continues to recognize their behavior through "consent of the manufacturing industry" (wondrous and sneaky form of propaganda). "How is it?" You asked without believing. The theory says that by building an argument. By arguing between two opposing acceptable views, one deviating slightly from the government's policy but the other one being somewhat correct, the media left the extremists and legitimized the line of Partisan I can.

The so-called "war on terror" is not contested at all by the establishment of a propaganda machine. Because it is the basic element of the empire where it is useful. By ensuring that terrorists are allowed to use military power after September 11, the empire can legally extend the existence of American war machines to any area it wishes. All of these are instability caused by the Bush war, creating a chaotic environment that can be abused and manipulated through the actions of the central information authorities such as Gaddafi and Assad, Mosad and other alliance intelligence agencies ing. Any disobedient leaders may be attacked. Western Assisted Terrorism Unit with the support of NATO troops

Consortiumnews recently issued an article by Rick Stirling "Syrian Mass Murder Statement raises concerns about US upgrades", lying to US military fighters, using advertisements, fake flags to create military interventionism It was discussed. History of a wide range of support. Sterling discusses the present fragile reasons of anti - assad stories hanging on our throat and simply reminds us that we were here earlier and began his article.

I said that the truth is the first victim of the war, and this is particularly true of the Cold War, but it should not be. As we all know, the BBC has a wide history as an advertising company for Western war machines, but it should not be so. Fighting Russia in the "information war" is not a job of a BBC journalist, it should convey her the truth and control power. By proposing that winning the "information war" with Russia should be given priority over critical thought and truth, McVeigh basically acknowledged that she is a Western war engines carrier It was. Her comments tells a lot about how she sees her role at the BBC, and this seems to be a culture cultivated through the media.