Analysis of the North's war of attacks from the Confederacy perspective: Today's world is blinded to the truth of "civil war", as they are the truth of creation and evolution controversy. They also make misleading textbooks blind as well. The truth is that North, Lincoln, etc are not big enough to claim them, and they have taken illegal measures due to unfair reasons. The public school system is used as a tool for the government, and still the American idea tends to tend to believe what they want.
Taking the American Civil War as an example, since the end of 150 years many of the southern people have called it "aggressive war in the north". Even if they dislike African Americans, they are still to commemorate their statues, to commemorate the actions of these southern people regarded as heroes yet they have been suppressed since they took part in the war It was a symbol of. Defend their rights to make them slavery! Freedom of speech is established and freedom of speech is one of truly democratic tripods is based on this provision. In this case, should Nnamdi Kanu and the other agitators do whatever they want? Yes. However, it is within the law and may only be within the jurisdiction of that right. Should we believe that the government does not respect the restrictions imposed by social contracts on the people it serves? It is not an abuser, but a guardian of law.
Historian William C. Davis has marked many myths surrounding the war as "frivolous", changed the name of the war through the "federation guerrillas" and continues to this day. He pointed out that names such as "northern war of invasion" and "war between Americans" created by Alexander Stevens are only attempts to deny that civil war is a real civil war. ... It is based on historical truth to acknowledge 'subject of cause of failure' (except to minimize the importance of slavery) (p. 46). Confederate soldiers are often numerous, irregular and hungry, southern civilians certainly suffered many material deprivation and unfair death, the US forces actually destroyed the southern infrastructure and private property It is. In the middle, Gallagher considered these patterns to be "federal" "festival" (p. 81)