If middle-aged elements gather to form the main components of modernism, then the artist's wandering spirit is its complementary part. He is a wanderer, a man who pursues "something" and is trying to find simple and absurd facts that have been wrapped up from higher meanings, fantasy lines and past experiences. Through modernism, it refers to the beginning of the Renaissance, and artists have always been interested in "discovery". Today, the times have changed: no patterns, no rules permitted, no rules are allowed; everything is allowed, and this is the only rule to follow.
Art history is somewhat different. There is lots of evidence, but I think that it has different properties. You can not do art with premise, you can not understand the world of artists and the culture and background of art creation. Art is a guideline, it is a direction of travel, it is not a destination. Art will tell us something, but it does not tell us. For one of such audiences, Tintoretto's "Three Beauties" may only serve the imagination; he used it as a porn. For others, it may be the starting point of Greek mythology meditation, and it is worth its own. Imagine that you can produce something as good as the image itself itself in a different way.
There is no artwork in a vacuum. It exists in the context and this context is important when evaluating it. First of all, there are artists who create it. Artists have history, image and status with the public. This will affect the perception of the work he / she produces - and eventually it will affect the assessment. Work by Damian Hirst is not necessarily artistically superior to the works of unknown artists. But it will definitely get more reputation and will sell at a higher price