The Vision of Emmanuel Levinas on Moral Evil and Our Responsibility

Emanuel Levinas was born in the early 19th century and grew up during the war. He was elected to the French Army and captured for many years. This experience as a prisoner made him a negative attitude towards human survival. He witnessed hatred and violence, and made a long discussion about it in his work. Levinus uses the human face as the basis of his morality. He expressed his moral not by reason or thought but with his own face. He calls this love "wisdom" because his morality is ethics of love, not a knowledge of understanding but a form of knowledge.

These ideas are based on the work of philosopher Emmanuel Levinas. Levinas's approach differs in that he recognizes the asymmetry of our relationship. For Levinas, the other is single and "mysterious", as well as the future, will never be fully known. Levinas believes that certain aspects of "others" are phenomenologically withdrawn or "timelike"; they are beyond reasonable understanding, but still correspond to Levinas need to do it. Gayathri Chakravorty Spivak writes articles on humanities in the context of a broader criticism of human rights and colonial history and is a "patient" who confuses the superiority of the people considered a responsible group and the savior- How to read "emphasizes the importance of practice. . It is from "Correcting the error". For Spivak:

Many philosophers including Emmanuel Levinas introduced the concept of "others". To Levinas, others have a background of ethics and responsibility; we should consider others as someone else. According to Levinas, the first interaction with others was done before we formed our intention. The other party answered us and we replied: even if there is no response it is a response. Therefore we begin to form culture and identity subject to the address of other people. After the formation of the will, we choose whether to identify the address with others and therefore continue the process of forming identity

Moral priorities of Emmanuel Levinas: About moral precedence, the show shows that Levinasian scholars are increasingly interested in language and epistemology issues. Therefore, I ignore the real meaning of Levinas' philosophy. moral. Shaw disagrees with the interpretation of "disassemblyism", and I believe that Levinas can not provide normative ethics and can not tell us how to act. Xiao believes Levinas' philosophy includes normative aspects. Because meeting meetings will reveal the obligation to take care of others who believe that normative ethics can be established. He defended this claim by providing a "practical" interpretation of Levinas and emphasizing the actual normality of the relationship with others, Shaw used the ideology of analytic moral philosophy.