The victim precipitation approach

This approach treats criminals and victims as partners of interaction and victims sometimes rape by appearing in signs, eye contacts, gestures, speech, in specific places, or by leaving the country alone I will encourage it. To go home, to answer conversations in a friendly way, to accept dinner invitations, to visit male friends in the house, or to invite male friends to his or her house , Misunderstood by the actor or intentionally rationalized as a sign of consent. Sexual activity. In other words, women were raped because they did not accurately convey the desire to not have sex.

This method has two main limitations. First, another theory blames the victim and accidentally blames the responsibility for sexual assault. Second, it does not take into account the fact that there is no equality between the victim and the criminal, and in these cases the men express their intent unambiguously. Also, in some cases, men also assume that women must have the right to force sexual behavior against their will. The myths derived from this view are as follows.

The use of rainfall of victims of crime such as rape often leads to strong criticism. This happens because the application of victims' rainfall in the context of sexual assault is considered a victim's condemnation. Condemnation of the victim is different from the rainfall of the victim. The former attempts to assign a certain amount of negligence or crime to the victim of the crime. On the other hand, the rainfall of the victim is an attempt to analyze the interaction between the victim and the criminal. Victim's rainfall is a criminal theory that analyzes how the interaction between victims and offenders leads to crime. This sentence was originally introduced by criminal Marvin Wolfgang and explained the victim as the first person to use physical strength against the next murderer of the murder drama.

The victims' rain was the first time that Wolfgang was used to explain the victim's first attacker in the acts that caused the injury or loss. Victims' rainfall is not only in Wolfgang's research but also in the spirit of early Mendelssohn (1956), including complete innocent victims (with no precipitation), the victims are more provocative than criminals is. One makes a guilty sinner. Rainfall can also be seen between the typology of people tortured by von Hentik who afflicted his family to contribute to his sacrifice, and with provocative victims and obvious victims there is. The latter type directly admits that certain victims have characteristics or do something to criminal offenders.