The Verdict on Net Neutrality Is In: We WON!

This victory does not mean that our opponent will cease. Even in battle or in the Supreme Court, we protect the Internet that is open there ... we will win with your help.

The time has come to raise the universal affordable open Internet fight to a new level. So we hope that you can build this victory with us.

In the past three years, we saw threats from net neutral victories being threatened. Activists in developed countries are working to promote the importance of online neutrality for free expression, innovation, and competition, and in some cases increasingly for regulatory audiences. Many of the developing countries are facing critics who believe that non-neutral Internet access can be used as "entrance" to open the Internet to a certain degree of freedom (even if supporting new evidence supports new research)

Under the trump regime, the neutrality of the network is threatened again, the current Internet service provider and the US Federal Communications Commission chairman Ahit, network neutral legal representative oversees free-market competition troublesome He insisted. Consumers who contend for neutrality of the net, for the neutrality of the net, as if they fighting against their core principles, this is especially true for other people who care about liberal and big government I will not admit it. As we know today, the broadband industry was born through the 1984 Wired Communication Policy Act (also known as the 1984 cable law). This bill was passed to clarify the relationship between local governments and cable providers with the aim of gradually improving cable extension throughout the continental United States.

This survey does not address substantial problems related to network neutrality. I have publicly supported the powerful network neutrality rules based on Chapter 2 of the Communications Act for a long time. And the majority of Americans who spend time publishing public comments to the Federal Communications Commission showed the same thing. I feel. A few people agree to abolish. But this is not one. It is about the right to manage people's identity and to prevent corruption and the process is designed to seek opinions from real people and institutions. Neutrality on the net, New Yorker or Texas, opposition to the support for the Democrats or Republicans - hundreds of thousands of people abuse their identities on-line should be anyone's problem.