The Utility of Robert Gilpin’s Realist Argument

With the establishment of formal international organizations in the 20th century (such as the United Nations), informal institutions (such as the G20), and other organizations (such as non-governmental organizations), global governance has become very important for society and the country. In the world. The State has established and participated in these organizations (Diehl & Frederking 2010 p. 30) to cooperate with international agreements to develop and implement consensus on international law and policy. They are also cooperating to tackle global problems and challenges such as war, health, human rights, the environment.

In addition, Mr. Holsti said Robert Gilpin's claim "International systems are in equilibrium unless there is a country that believes it would be beneficial to change the international system." To determine the problem of participation in war. If this new realism assumption is true, the most powerful country will participate in constant expansion until one of the countries realizes the empire that encompasses the whole world.

As mentioned earlier, Robert Gilpin is also an expert on HST, in stark contrast to the notion of Keohane's liberalism, which details the realism of HST. Gilpin argued that the existence of a free economic state as a subject of hegemony is a necessary condition for the development of the international economy, but Gilpin firmly believes that hegemon states are the center of international order and international economy. It is always the case to secure a stable international order of public goods. This program is clearly effective until all countries have a unipolar hegemonic system.

Robert Gilpin's groundbreaking work "War and Change in World Politics" provides another way to develop the realism theory in international relations. If this research can become more prominent with IR scholarship than wasteful theoretical discussion, today we will be better prepared for "fast force transmission and geopolitical change" ( Wohlforth, 2011). 505). We can explain the reasons for war and long-term peace, and the emergence and decline of international order. Another approach is provided by applying new scientific knowledge to social science. For example, recent research by Alexander Wendt, Quantum Mind and Social Science has proved this. A new realistic international political approach can be based on quantum theory, the concept of human evolution, and the organic and holistic worldview that humans increasingly recognize in the course of evolution (Korab-Karpowicz 2017)