THe US Constitution and the Bill of Rights

The US Constitution is the central tool of the government, "the land of the highest law". It is the oldest constitution in the world. It was written in Philadelphia in 1787 by the New World Conference of the United States and was officially adopted in 1789. The aim of the writer is to outline the structure of the new and powerful central government over a weak and chaotic year. Since 1778, the existing "federal and permanent alliance provision" has bound colonies.

Feature similar to the US constitution: legislation of bicameral system, bill of rights, separation of power and checks and equilibrium. The US Constitution is a free constitution that establishes the basic structure and principles of the government. The Texas State Constitution is a statutory constitution as it regulates the structure and power of the government. They have a long history in the country, but the US Constitution does not mention local governments. Let's think about the New England City Hall meeting held during the colonial period. The State Constitution creates legal grounds for the governments of counties and cities (cities), which can make units for other municipalities such as hospital areas and transportation. Many local governments enjoy a considerable autonomy in their daily work unless their behavior violates state and domestic laws and constitutions.

Respect of our country includes respect for the rights stipulated in the constitution, including the Bill of Rights. The Constitution stipulates "... the right to peaceful gatherings and the right to request the government to rectify the public dissatisfaction." When the president of the United States clearly disagrees with individuals exercising the right to expression and assembly freedom, this directly oppose the value that our country values. As a private citizen, he has the right to express his opinion and express his opinion. As a civil servant he is on behalf of our government and it is not best to express an opinion that he can be interpreted as an official statement against the exercise of the first revision right.