When we grow we know a lot of things, but for various reasons we can not think of it. There may be something we forget or intuition and feelings sometimes struggling with words, so British psychoanalyst Christopher Boras calls it "unknown unknown" is. The memory of these experiences lives at the boundary between our consciousness and the unconscious mind. The pressure that we feel in our bodies is one of the main ways to track and reveal most of this "unknown knowledge".
In the 1980's, Boras created the term "unknown unknown" to describe the experience that may be known to the individual in some way, but they could not think. The spiritual breakdown may be in an unknown category. For example, people with schizophrenia may fail, but his memory may not be completely understood and analyzed. Probably the most controversial and persuasive is that Boras emphasizes the importance of alternative therapies, especially intensive psychotherapy. When a patient asks Bolus "schizophrenia curiosity" a clinician's private life, clinicians often avoid sharing details about themselves for occupation, thereby inadvertently feeling a sense of security to the patient Giving. If they are irrelevant, if they are difficult to express their closest friends and family, who will serve these patients? Who will listen there?
This reminds me of the term I recently invented from Christopher Bollas - definitive knowledge. "We do not know what we know about ourselves, but we have forgotten in some way.They are the dreams that we have ignored and the truth we have are mentioned by the author Meg Jay In other words, everything else you do not matter because you are afraid that your parents are thinking about it, or because it is afraid that it is cute enough for your friends As you can respond to you, you will be taken care of by other people in the world. Immediately after I noticed I knew it - but this is another article
It is one. The power and power of knowledge can not tolerate differences - new things, unthinked things, external things - and can not be adapted by forcing the structure to adapt it to it. I was not disturbed or disturbed. The problem still remains. Considering how buildingism theorists tend to cut off some buildings that do extraordinary things when it seems that there is no effect or effect, think about how to divide the building I will. How can I use it to infect outside buildings? In other words, how will it be to encounter, to realize transformation, or to be a series of buildings that can interwork with elements (or a few) from outside the philosophy series, two of which change with encounter Did. Architectural philosophy is only achieved by becoming a philosophical framework