The Unnecessary Nuclear Attacks on Nagasaki and Hiroshima

The ideology of realism represents statelessness and is fighting for its own reasons for self-interest to protect the interests of the country. After the Japanese Air Force attacked Pearl Harbor in Hawaii on December 7, 1941, the US military unexpectedly caused the public's attention to Japan. In 1945, President Harry S. Truman decided to launch a nuclear bomb at Hiroshima on August 6, then Nagasaki on August 9 for August 9. A few days later, Japan surrendered and World War II is about to end.

According to the principles and rules of international humanitarian law applied to armed conflict, the use of nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki is illegal. Two cities were bombed, civilians were targeted, nuclear weapons were used. The inability to distinguish between civilians and military goals has created unnecessary suffering for civilian survivors. According to the historical record, the decision to use the atomic bomb is that it was to bring about Japan's surrender with great power. These observations led Michael Wolzer to assert that the case was "war terrorism act: mass casual killing of the citizen and compulsory surrender of the government, Hiroshima seemed to be a typical case of me" It was. · P. Newman said, "Since there may be only war, there may be reasonable fear."

The justification of the bombing case in Hiroshima and Nagasaki The moral and military need for bombing cases in Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been controversial for nearly half a century. Most revisionists have emphasized that Japan was sacrificed by this attack. They often forget the military reality and historical background and at the same time judge whether the US needs to use nuclear weapons in two Japanese cities. It is worth noting that Japan is an invader. - The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Hiroshima and Nagasaki has become a military controversy. Questions such as "Is this a right decision, or will it happen again?" The only purpose of manufacturing these two weapons of mass destruction is to hope to surrender from the Japanese, which basically does. But such a decision is truly the only option Japan abandons. This controversial topic is under discussion today.