The Universality of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet

The universality of Romeo and Juliet seems to be debated whether Shakespeare (or other classical events) should be "modernized". I think you can see it in two ways. Both depend on the universality of work. It is universal and modern, it only highlights this fact, or it is universal and modern, it is not necessary. I think Romeo and Juliet are a good example. This story still affects the audience's lives, do you think they were set up during the Elizabethan era?

William Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet are the two star lovers of Romeo and Juliet. They come from two competing families. Romeo's role comes from a role called Montague and Juliet, if William Shakespeare comes from Capret, William Shakespeare will make these families very similar in respect of dignity. - Keats 'Greek people of Greece' provides conflicting aesthetic concepts. It explains that frozen beauty depicted in a pot is sweeter than reality, as its expiration date is impossible to lock. Lover's kiss is sweeter than waiting, and her eternal beauty and devotion is impossible to kiss. Therefore, the observation of beauty is sweeter than its tolerance, the purpose of their heyday is the best before it expires.

In William Shakespeare's play "Romeo and Juliet", Shakespeare introduces characters through Romeo and Juliet's dilemma through various language skills and structure. Romeo and Juliet is a lover studded with stars. Romeo and Juliet are from families who are not married together. They encountered many difficult situations in the drama. Theater was set up during the Elizabethan era, there were major changes in religion, family, and politics. Attitude and key