The United States Should Lower the Legal Drinking Age to Eighteen

The minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) in the United States is 21 years old. This is a perfect example of a policy with unrealistic expectations and serious unintended consequences. The current policy is that the United States actually drink alcohol and actually make young people under the age of 21 crime. Because young people want to drink under the age of 21, why should America not reduce MLDA to 18 years old. After the 1933 alcohol ban, many states have their own National Tax Agency 21. In the 1960s and 1970s, many states reduced it to 18 in order to meet the drafting age (alcohol policy MD).

There are many people who can come up with a convincing argument that the drinking age in the United States should be lowered from 21 to 18. Legal drinking age should not be reduced. There are many reasons why it is better not to reduce legal drinking age such as group safety or personal health. Allowing young people to drink at a younger age can lead to more deadly traffic accidents, higher crime rates, and often lead to social worsening. - More than 5,000 young people are driving the US every year (Gregory). In my opinion, this is due to three different but equally important factors. The first factor is that the minds of young people have not yet fully developed, which has led them to make irresponsible and reckless decisions. The second factor is that driving experience has changed since the first driving age was established in the early 20 th century.

There was controversy over the problem that the United States should reduce the age of drinking at the age of 18. An 18 year old child should have the right to drink. 18 years old is regarded as an adult but inviting overeating leads to an increase in fatalities and alcohol damage. Brain cells, especially the body itself. Reducing the age of drinking to 18 years is beneficial for the manager.