The United States Illogical Practice of Democratic Peace Theory in the Middle East

For centuries, the hearts of people have always had sustainable ideal world peace ideas. The most notable expression is Kant's view of permanent peace. "He believes this is a condition for political maintenance between the government and the government that separates power and power.This departure from this basic framework is" democratic peace theory "(p. 82) . Democratic Peace Theory (DPT) democracy is generally claimed to never fight other democracy. Because they share common norms and domestic institutions and restrict international and domestic entities from participating in war.

Consider, for example, Bush's pursuit of democratic peace. He said that the people in the Middle East are anxious for freedom and coexistence. Assuming that democratic societies do not fight against each other, the theory of democratic peace is attractive. However, as currently considered, war with terrorism has made the Arab world more democratic. In order to start a preventive war, rights must be established throughout the Middle East and Central Asia. In order to fulfill its military needs, the United States must sign and support an agreement with a repressive and evil regime against the principles of democracy.

Although war may aid the construction of the country before the transition to peace and security democracy, war is a serious obstacle to democratization. The consent of democratic peace theory argues that democracy appeared before peace, but historical evidence is contrary. In most cases, peace is before democracy. There are few people who support the assumption that democracy brings peace, but strong evidence of the opposite assumption that peace brings democracy. Christian Wellsel 's human rights empowerment theory argues that existing - security security will lead to cultural values ​​of liberation and support for democratic political organizations. This is consistent with the theory based on evolutionary psychology. The so-called equality theory finds that people have psychological preferences for strong leadership and form of authoritarian government when there is war and collective danger.

Among foreign policy analysts in the United States explain the potential spread of Islamic priesthood and liberal democracy in the Middle East as two different possibilities of Domino theory. During the war between Iran and Iraq, the United States and other Western countries supported Iraq 's Bath Party, feared that Iranian radical theocracy spread throughout the region. At the invasion of Iraq in 2003, some new conservatives thought that when a democratic government was implemented it would help spread dissemination and liberalism throughout the Middle East. This is called "reverse domino theory" or "democratic domino theory". The influence of Western democracy is regarded as positive rather than negative.