The Underworld and Morality in Vergil's Aeneid

AeNice Book IV which provides the basis for the whole work morally only as the epic center, the best literary achievements of Aenace and Virgil in the Netherworld Netherworld. After explaining the travel of Aeneas through the Netherworld and experiencing the depth of hell, he arrived at his father's place at Elysium. Erythium is a lie of the "soul" whose destiny is borne by another flesh (115). Anchises handed over Rome's prophecy to Aeneis. Someday, please show me the great soul occupying the body of the leader of Rome.

Comparison of Ainel and deformation Virgil and Ovid embed a latent meaning in the magnificent "Aneid" and "Transformation". In this article we will focus on the basic meaning of the triad scene of Vergil's The Aeneid (lines 356 - 1199). I am paying attention to the three scenes of Ovid's pervert. Both epics contain more information about the importance of Roman past to the present and the future of Augustus. The story of Aeneesa of "Underworld" can be interpreted as a wonderful interpretation of Roman past, present, and future stories. When Aeneas got off to the underground world, he was escorted to Sibyl (347 -

AeNice Book IV which provides the basis for the whole work morally only as the epic center, the best literary achievements of Aenace and Virgil in the Netherworld Netherworld. After explaining the travel of Aeneas through the Netherworld and experiencing the depth of hell, he arrived at his father's place at Elysium. In the world of bliss, "Fate belongs to another body" (115). Anchises handed over Rome's prophecy to Aeneis. Someday, please show me the great soul occupying the body of the leader of Rome.

Aeneas is a small character of Iliad, but later the main character of Latin epic was written by Virgil of Egnell. Virgil has made Aeneas the founder of Rome (or, more exactly, the Italian town that founded Rome later). In Homer, however, after the Greeks left and the Trojans were rebuilt, Aeneas was destined to become the king of Troy. Now, let's consider how the new evidence modifies the picture. We believe that the understanding of the Trojan War is almost wrong. In the old outlook, the war was determined by the duel of the Trojan plain champion; the besieged city never had the opportunity to face the Greeks; the Trojan must be a myth. It's not like more war on terror, it's like World War II. But now, we know that the Trojan War was mainly low-intensity conflict and attacks on civilians. There is no siege of Troy. The Greeks are weak and only one skill to accept Troy. This technique is probably a Trojan horse.