Dostoevsky's "underground memo" depicts a person deeply rooted in a disgusting and bitter lifestyle. He is strongly dominated by his heavy philosophy. An underground man (see below) is based on his own precedent about the concept of how life lives. His thorough understanding of how people should interact socially and how they should interact emotionally has been thoroughly figured out. He is very contradictory to rationalization of practice, but he seems to accuse himself with his own self-indignation.
Although this book is by no means autobiography, Dostoevsky uses underground people as a container for publishing their political criticisms and philosophical concepts. The heart of this monologue is the conflict between the roots of underground people in the romanticism of the writers of the early 19th century and the emergence of the science surrounding him and material realism. The rumors of underground people was a direct criticism of Utopia's political work that appeared then, especially on "What to do" by Nikolai Czerny Chefsky. A man under the ground violently opposed the idea that human happiness can be reduced to the physical environment in his head. On the contrary, the belief of underground people, that is, the happiness itself conflicts with the human desire, and then there is a contradictory relationship between rationality and free will.
Reasoning anguish of underground human beings reflected in Lisa and salvation of Kerkel guard: philosophical analysis of Dostoevsky's "underline note"
Under Fyodor Dostoevsky's "Underground Notes", a man under the ground insisted he was not active. This is what I call "doing nothing, I think it is very interesting, when I read that Jean - Paul Sartre is simple, I remembered the people in the basement." Existentialism is a kind of humanitarianism . "Underground people are fully aware that only you are choosing or lacking in choice and he suffers from his choice before making a decision.This is nothing for him In terms of articles, people are subconscious, existentialists.
In the basement, suffering is a form of rebellion. If his life is a mere expression, his freedom of choice is not free to him, so he uses his ability to infer that his behavior is irrational. He seems to believe that his conscious movement will become increasingly deep pain as a rejection of nature's law and reason and as contempt for the logical result of human nature. Even his absurdity is reasonable, and this is the capital city of thought he opposes as he knows he can not get rid of it. Regardless of what he does, even though he is glorious and despising it, his will and freedom will never escape the reality formula. Even though he recognizes that it is a vicious circle, he may be happy because this battle is too big for him, but he is not.
Rational hardship of underground human beings reflected in Lisa and salvation of Kerkel guard: philosophical analysis of Dostoyevsky's "underline note"