The U.S. should ratify the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)

In this way you can earn some benefits from the Convention, but the formal participation of the United States in the Convention has many advantages.

For example, the United States is in a better position to invoke the provisions of the Convention, which is a Contracting Party, such as differences in bilateral views where other countries do not understand or accept these provisions.

We can rely on diplomatic and business challenges to handle excessive maritime requests, but it is best to establish other ways to solve conflicts.

Conventions are carried out in various forums, including conventions and other specific forums (such as international maritime agencies). In the past 10 years after the entry into force of the Convention, organizations of the Convention were not particularly active, but they are currently in operation, various provisions have been formulated and interpreted. If the United States is a Contracting Party of the Convention, the United States will be able to better protect its military and other interests in these forums.

To be a member of the Convention makes it possible for the United States to appoint members of the Court and the Continental Shelf Committee. Incorporating US members into these institutions will help ensure that the Convention is interpreted and applied for US interests.

As a party, the United States can obtain the legal certainty of a continental shelf claim of 200 miles or more. And it will promote the activities of the US oil and gas industry in these areas.

Parties that are "treaties" will strengthen our ability to transfer proposals that may conflict with US interests, including freedom of navigation. It is noteworthy that the "treaty" will be amended next November. In addition to the positive reason for participating in the Convention, there is a negative side risk of not participating in the Convention. For the past two decades, the liquidity and accessibility of the United States has been largely protected and enjoyed thanks to the stable and widely accepted legal framework of the Convention. It is dangerous to think that it is possible to maintain the stability situation currently enjoyed by the United States indefinitely. Over time, domestic practices may change customary international law and therefore do not provide future stability as a party to the Convention.

The United States participated in the negotiations of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea) that came into force in 1994, but the treaty has not yet been concluded. The United States recognizes that the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea is a codification of the conventional international law, but it can not become a signatory to the Convention and the political, military and economic Increasingly harmful to profit. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea regulates the legal framework for the management of maritime navigation and the use of marine resources. There are 3.4 million square miles of sea in the world's largest exclusive economic zone (EEZ), and the United States can be advantageous by becoming a signatory country. By participating in the convention, the United States can adhere to the requirements of the extended continental shelf (ECS), which is over twice the area of ​​California, over 1 million square kilometers.

Definition of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: "The Law of the Sea" officially known as the "3rd UN Convention on the Law of the Sea" or "the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea" was adopted in 1982. Its purpose is to replace the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in 1958 (UNCLOS I) and 1960 (UNCLOS II), which is considered to be inappropriate, establishing a comprehensive ocean rule. (Http://www.unlawoftheseatreaty.org/) Not reserved Definition: The Vienna Convention on the Convention Act is an authoritative document on the International Treaty Act. Since most of the provisions are believed to reflect conventional international law, it is considered formally to be binding in the country (such as the United States) that is not a party to the Vienna Convention.