The U.S. Needs Comprehensive Immigration Reform

Since the last General Assembly reformed our immigration control system, the executive summary has existed for nearly 30 years. From the Reagan era to the Obama administration, the country has experienced financial, social and political changes, but our immigration policy remains unchanged. Since the last immigration reform in 1986, the US government has spent about $ 187 billion on immigration law enforcement agencies and programs (adjusted to $ 220 billion) (Meissner, Kerwin, Muzaffar & Bergeron, 2013).

Strict employment-based visa reform reforms are not synchronized with employer, US economy, US society and immigration needs, and must be part of an effective comprehensive immigration reform law. In this report, MPI recommends creating a new visa stream called a temporary visa to associate temporary visas and permanent entry requests with the purpose of work in a predictable and transparent way. The authors believe that this concept has achieved the best in balancing the two main objectives of the labor market's immigration policy: it is the economic growth and competition while preserving the wages and benefits of American workers We support the force; promote the social and economic integration of immigrants.

Comprehensive immigration reform is the concept of the first inflationary policy in the political world of the United States in 2001. It has the capacity to strengthen the enforcement of the border, to legalize unauthorized immigrants and to introduce future workers necessary for the US labor market. In the US Senate debates in 2006, 2007 and 2013, comprehensive immigration reform (CIR) touched on almost all aspects of the US immigration control system. Here we analyze many of the meanings of policy and CIR law.

Despite the impact of strengthening the implementation of federal immigration laws, the US government was unable to adopt comprehensive immigration reforms. The 2007 Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act indicates a path of legalization that has not been documented but has rejected the US Senator. Efforts to resume the immigration reform negotiations have also failed and this lack of progress encouraged the state to support their immigration policy. Although there is a historical precedent for criminalizing immigrant groups, the introduction of state immigration policies is new (Mittelstadt et al., 2011). It is noteworthy that illegal entry into the United States is not a criminal crime (Kansas v. Martinez, 38 Kan. App 2 d 324, 2007). But the Legislature is about to change this. In 2010, the Arizona State legislature passed law enforcement and safe regional support law (SB 1070).