The trouble with diversity

A few years ago, American scholar Walter Benn Michaels wrote a book called The Trouble With Diversity. From the perspective of a standard left-handed campus, he pointed out the diversity of current fashion. Of course, this is wonderful. People with different groups and backgrounds are mixed, and we will be better. However, this simple idea has evolved into diverse industries today. There is a problem with this.

When at least one of us said this, we are more inclined to this discussion. I will go further. The first argument is all sex, melanin, background content. Because life experience is different, you can have your own perspective to pose problems and problems in your life. So when we think about how to sail in these torrents and herds, we should at least listen to all these sounds.

However, regardless of the current fashion perspective, where all these sounds have an intellectual perspective, where is it and what is important. This is a diverse experience, so I applauded from the beginning

The Saatchi and Saatchi presidents took vacations immediately after advising on 'comprehensive' debate about gender bias in the advertising industry.

Kevin Roberts, head of advertising agency Publicis Groupe, said she does not believe that women playing a leading role lack the "problem".

Whether he is right or not is not a problem. As Gary Becker points out, he is a very competitive industry in the case of taste discrimination and rational discrimination, especially if you are doing the latter rather than the real former. It is a chance. The dinosaur surely dies.

But when I saw this, we looked like a lost laugh. This seems to be a good proof of Michael's point of view:

The Publicis group announced the statement as soon as he was asked to take a holiday because of "Roberts' comment on gravity".

Yang Lion CEO Maurice Levy sent a note to employees stating that "diversity and inclusiveness is a business requirement that Publicis Groupe does not negotiate"

Obviously, is the diversity of ideas the first place to assert the diversity of the idea that we are pursuing, not the place we entered right now?

When it was first announced in 2006, the "diversity problem" caused a storm of praise and condemnation - not simply called "genius" (economist), "persuasive" (New Yorker) It is called a "very incredible" product, "slate", and "missed, memorized" (nation). Ten years later, Michaels has come up with a new posting on how we can strengthen our opportunity equalized exploitation system. His commitment to diversity did not provide the preconditions for social justice, did not provide resistance or even criticism, but actually justified the economic forces that promoted inequality. Most importantly, he thinks we should not pay much attention to the illusion of the illusion ...

103604 Various questions: How do we love sympathy and learn to ignore inequality Michaels, Walter Ben In this provocative book, Michaels is passionate about "difference" We ignore the economic disparity by believing that it hides the huge growing US. By examining the books we read, the television programs we saw, and the lawsuits we brought, he is useful for us as diversity provides a wrong vision of social justice I showed that I became a sacred mother for everyone. . 243 pgs. • 2006