Sacco and Vanzetti's trial Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti - whether they are guilty, or simply victims of the environment. you decide. This case is one of the most controversial cases in America's history, soon you will understand why. Sakko and Vanzetti were Italian immigrants who moved to the United States in 1908. At that time, Sacco was 17 years old, Vanzetti was 20 years old. In April 1920, Sakko worked at a shoe factory and Vanzetti sold fish on the street. Of the two immigrants, only Saco has a family in the United States.
A: Sacco and Fan Zetti's tests prove that the US is afraid that people who share political differences with foreigners do not have it. Sacco and Fan Zetti are Italian anarchists that have been unjustly altered and executed. Scope trial shows that Americans do not want any religious change and believe that their Bible beliefs are the only correct things to be taught. The first red panic gave Americans a communist phobia. They believe communists dominate the government and destroy their democracy.
The arrest of Sacco and Fan Zetti was consistent with the severe political repression in American history, Red Panic of 1919 - 20 years. The red panic had a major impact on the arrest and trial of Sacco and Fan Zetti. In the early 1920s, Americans were very delusive about the penetration of American communists. Therefore, they are biased towards immigrants and those who seem a bit aggressive. As most of the US thinks this way, how can two Italian immigrants, viewed as anarchists, take a fair trial in the meantime? For this reason, Sacco and Vanzetti lawyer Fred H. Moor decided not to justify Sacco and Vanzetti for murder and robber charges. They are not convicted for evidence but are convicted for their opinion. The defense of the Moor caused many political tensions
Opinions remain divided as to whether Sacco and Vanzetti are guilty or whether they are innocent victims of biased legislation and fraud trials. Some authors claim that Sacco is guilty, but Fan Zetti is innocent. But many historians believe that the two men should take the second trial in light of the serious flaws in their trials.