The Trial and Untimely Death of Socrates

You can want to know if Socrates is so confused about this, what a riddle is, or only those in the Athens alone who are smarter. Then when he said "serve the gods", he went out to study and ask the wise to see if they were smarter than themselves. No matter who goes to see him talking to him, he brings the same result. Everyone is wise in their own field and they believe they know other subjects, they believe I will. For everyone, he tried to help them by showing them, or they tried to humiliate them as we said today, they are not as smart as they think.

In my opinion Socrates's trial and out-dated death are being thrown only by a few people who point out that they are not clever. The inference used by Socrates is the best example of a fact, not an operation, to prove that you are innocent. Socrates commented a bit about the waste of the time of the trial, even if he was taken to the court he was innocent. I agree that death is a misjudgment of the jury and the jury should vote without sin. In order to understand and accurately judge charges against Socrates, we must understand how he confused his accusers. It began with the god of Delphi. Can imagine ... Show more

The innocent aim of Socrates is to explore the death of Socrates and reasonably support the jury of the Socrates trial in the judgment of the death penalty. One of the main arguments against Socrates in his trial was "rude". This assertion concretely states that Socrates ignored the gods of the accepted city and introduced the new gods. "Ignore the spirit of the masses" may refer to Socrates' individualism

This article would argue that during the "Socrates trial and death" Socrates might have offered better arguments about his defense. First, I will outline prejudice and accusation Socrates must face during the trial. That then shows how difficult Socrates is, and he wants to lose the case, and in the end it will end the discussion Socrates may give to be innocent. - All conflicts of Socrates's greatest condemnation and Athenian law in political philosophy are the conflict between philosophy and politics. The problem of philosophy being politically friendly is still left. Questioning an authoritative view is not easy to achieve, it is not a philosophical field - it is not pursuing wisdom. Socrates is a fighter of the conflict. Political factors arise from the point of political life, but Socrates' question is "What is the best system, how should I live"?