The Transcendent Nature of Sound in The Lives of Others

The ability of human beings to perceive sound is often considered commonplace and is erroneously considered important for vision. Certainly, our main understanding of the world is through visual development, but the sound is our ability to communicate with each other in a concrete and abstract way, and the ability to define nuances that shape our environment is. If it is not healthy, humans will be alienated by their own uncertainties, and they can not represent fears and ambitions common to our situation.

Look at your first point, "Beyond knowledge and subordinate to it" ("Integration" may be a better word), it seems to be very close to Feyerabend. There seems to be two aspects to this problem. One is to know ourselves in nature through creative activities and the other is to link the relationship between epistemology and the trends of society as a whole. Because knowledge of all periods is not "transcendental or subordinate". Therefore, as you said, all epistemology, including Marx's, is certainly bourgeois.

It is easy to accept internal transcendence (and not so), but naturalisticism denies itself and the whole thing inherent. Self-contained type, self-generated type, autocatalytic type, self-organizing type, self-supporting type, self-destructive type are all natural. On the contrary, faith believes that the inner reality, the reality we experience, and the reality of scientific exploration are all due to its existence and operation, and the source and destiny of transcendence. In contrast to the inner transcendence, it should be obvious that it is basically impossible to transcend human observation, interpretation and manipulation, otherwise it is not transcendental. As suggested, this is indeed an idol.

Tirich has unnecessary ambiguity concerning God's transcendence and inner thought. On the other hand, he is talking about religious naturalists who make God completely intrinsically intrinsic. On the other hand, he is talking about extreme supernaturalists who make God almost identical to Barthian. In other words, Tirich seems to emphasize the absolute intrinsic nature of God and the absolute transcendence of God on the one hand. However, it is almost impossible to match these two views. If God is absolutely intrinsic, he absolutely can not transcend. The premise of the dialectic principle is that there is a point of contact between "yes" and "no", so at this point it is impossible to help him even with the dialectic principle of Tillich. Tillich noticed this.

Chapter 5 "Comparison of God's Concepts in Paul Tillich and Henry Nielsen Wiman's Thought"