The Trans-formative Qualities of Literature

A simple free question brings countless possibilities, from a quick answer "why it is not literature" to answers from the depth of critical thought, and to much guess. Throughout history, literature has made a great contribution to the formation of the social context of our society. Some people say literature is gradually dying. What happens if you delete old literary excellence criteria from high school or university? In our textbook "Literature: Human Experience", the writer of David Foster Wallace wrote in the mentor 's preface: "We are all suffering in the real world alone, true sympathy is impossible.

To seek secularization and meaning. We emphasize the religious significance of the aesthetic qualities of art and literature, but aesthetics and form can emphasize the contents (overly). Almost all of "great" literature and art has solved and deepened our understanding of the existence of meaning in life. What is the essence of my human nature? How do you understand pain and death? What is justice? What is the responsibility for my life? What do I want? What is love? How is the human condition? In many cases, these are called "religious" problems. One of the reasons is that religious tradition provides widely accepted answers, and some are that they are ultimately important. Of course there are also secular ways to think about these problems.

Literature is tackling a series of ideas essential to human experience, and these ideas can transcend time; otherwise it is irrelevant. Therefore, the way of criticism such as historism and Marxism, the way to focus on literature rather than literary background is not an effective way. - Student Jeremy Rozansky Politics is a great expert and great governor and literature, not only inversely related to each other, but in an opposite relationship. For political science, literature is decadent, soft, irrelevant, boring, wrong, boring, meaningless, and in reality should not be. why? The special urge is literature. How do you become an artist and give up on nuances? But how can you be a politician and allow nuances? As an artist, Nuance is your job. Your task is not to simplify